At the start if the season, I did a look at those the hockey world tragically lost in 2011, including Derek Boogaard. In early December, The New York Times ran a three-part series that had spent six months looking at the life and death of the NHL enforcer.
It’s worth the time to read the lengthy pieces as the debate continues over what makes one become an NHL enforcer and what may have led to the ultimate demise of so many recently. Most notable is the conclusion of the series which looks at the effect that years of hits had on the brain of Boogaard.
Part One: Learning to Brawl looks at the difficulties that Boogaard had growing up. The family moving around a lot, his size, his expected role as an enforcer, his lack of academic ability, his determination to be a hockey player despite lacking skillset, all made it difficult for Derek to fit in and led him down a twisted, emotional road where fighting seemed to be his only option.
Part Two: Blood on the Ice examines Derek Boogaard’s transition into a full-fledged NHL heavyweight fighter. One feared by those he towered over, known for his ability to cause damage with just a couple of well-placed punches. At the same time, coaches within the Wild system admit that they didn’t do Boogaard any justice by simply allowing him to develop as nothing more than an enforcer rather than helping him to try to develop other skills. But out of sheer determination and willingness to fight, Boogaard found his dream…to play in the NHL.
Though with that dream, people around him noticed differences in his personality. And, there were concerns about the physical toll that the fighting was taking on his body and the cognitive effects that were hidden. Throughout the article are quotes from other NHL enforcers and the extreme toll that fighting took on their physical and mental capabilities.
It was during the 2007-2008 season that Derek Boogaard began taking prescription painkillers for his back. This would be the start of the downward spiral that led to his first stint in rehab two years later. In retrospect, there were signs that the article examines that were clues that Boogaard was susceptible to addiction.
Part Three: A Brain “Going Bad” looks at the final phase of Derek Boogaard’s career, what led to his passing, and what he has taught us in death. After completing rehab, his work ethic declining, Boogard signed with the New York Rangers for the 2010-2011 season. His slump and injuries followed him to his new team. It was during this time that family and friends began to notice depression, mood swings, and lapses in memory.
Also evident to those around him were the symptoms of his prescription drug addiction and in the spring of 2011, he was sent by the Rangers to rehab under the NHL/NHLPA Substance Abuse Program. On leave to attend his sister’s graduation on May 12th, Derek went out partying with his brothers and friends. The next day his brothers would find him death from an accidental overdose of alcohol and oxycodone.
Probably the most significant part of this series came from the study done on Boogaard’s brain by scientists at Boston University. Boogaard had chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a relative of Alzheimer’s disease which can only be diagnosed after death. The symptoms include memory loss, impulsive behavior, move swing, and addiction. It is believed to be caused by repeated blows to the head and has been found in the brains of 80 former athletes, mostly former NFL players, boxers, and now 4 out 4 hockey players studied. One of those was Bob Probert, Boogard’s CTE was more advanced than that of Probert.
While the others studied had developed it later in life, it appeared to be spreading through Derek’s brain and he most likely would have suffered dementia by mid-life. Doctors were stunned that this was the brain of a 28-year-old.
The NHL refuses to acknowledge this link despite the later deaths of Rick Rypien and Wade Belak.
I encourage you to also take advantage of the interactive components of this series. Look at Derek’s handwritten notes, watch the 3-part video series, and all of the other bonus material.
As concussions continue to plague the league and the debate over headshots drags on, maybe someone will wake up to the scientific evidence of how dangerous fighting and undiagnosed and untreated concussions really are.
Steps are being taken despite the refusal to acknowledge the scientific link. One only needs to look at the IRs of NHL teams to see the unprecedented number of players out with concussions. The implementation of the “quiet room” rule where any player that sustained a hit to the head had to leave the ice and be examined by a doctor was a great concept. But how many times do we see players not leave the ice? And, honesty is a must. We’ve seen too many players and/or teams hide a player’s concussion for a while. There is no way of knowing that all teams are taking the same cautious approach in allowing players to return. The league is going to have to find a way to enforce their policies and punish those that don’t comply. Even still, there are instances where symptoms may not show for days. But, everyone must do their due diligence to stop this epidemic now that we are seeing evidence of the kind of damage done to the brain.
What we have learned from Boogaard is invaluable and we owe to all players to take away some lessons. We owe it to all players to try to prevent them from facing a future of neurological problems that we now know can be prevented with correct diagnostics and care.
While we’re on the subject of must-reads, if you’re fortunate enough to find a copy of Dave Schultz’ biography—“The Hammer: Confessions of a Hockey Enforcer”—buy it. Published back in 1981 by Summit Books, it’s a fascinating look at how a shy, gentle-natured farm boy from the prairies of Saskatchewan evolved into the most feared enforcer of his day.
I will definitely try to find it as I have heard much about The Hammer!
Outstanding article, Coach.
At the risk of sounding like a Neanderthal, I must confess that I’ve always enjoyed a good toe-to-toe scrap. Fights can swing the momentum of a game and often add a heightened level of tension and drama to what already is the world’s most exciting sport.
However, as you’ve so eloquently pointed out, the number of players sustaining concussions and other serious injuries due to hockey fights has become downright alarming—to say nothing of the long-term psychological and physiological effects. Today’s players are bigger, stronger and better-conditioned than ever before. The old adage that “no one gets hurt in a hockey fight” no longer applies.
The good news for hockey purists is that fighting in the NHL has been on the decline for over two decades (.47 fights per game this season vs. an all-time high of 1.3 fights per game in 1987-88 according to dropyourgloves.com). Even brawling teams like the Philadelphia Flyers are turning the other cheek. With more and more players entering the league from the collegiate ranks and Europe—where fisticuffs are banned—fighting appears to be dying a natural, if stubborn death.
Whether the NHL will take the next step and ban fighting altogether is anybody’s guess.
Thanks, Rick.
I’m with you, I enjoy a good fight. They definitely can add momentum and really bring out the emotion and passion that is such a big part of the sport. I don’t think we’ll ever see a ban on fighting.
The older players whose brains have been studied along with Boogaard’s were all fighters, so the head injuries that scientists have to go by are mostly the result of fists and such. Most of the young players we are seeing now on the IRs are suffering concussions due to the simple contact nature of the sport. They may not suffer the psychological effects of guys like Boogaard, Rypien, and Belak, but the physiological harm is assured.
Several retired players not too far removed from the game have recently promised their brains to science to be studied. These are players who don’t even know how many concussions they suffered but would just get back on the ice. It will be a long time though before we know anything from those eventual studies.
As a Pens fan, one player who always sticks out in my mind is Kevin Stevens. Listening to him give interviews the past few years has been almost painful. You can hear the damage done in his voice and you have flashbacks to some of the hits he took. People will chirp in about his later drug use also having an effect. However, after reading the BU summary of the study on Boogaard, maybe the drug habit was a symptom of the trauma he suffered to the brain during all the hits. The drugs then only exacerbate the effects of any neurological deterioration.
It’s funny how just a little bit of new knowledge makes you start wondering and looking back on things with a whole new perspective.
More excellent insights, Coach.
With so many players being sidelined with concussions these days, it almost seems like it’s a sudden, recent phenomenon. But you bring up a good point about older players like Stevens. Back in the day, I think they had a “just rub some dirt on it and go out and play” mentality. Goodness knows how many concussions these guys suffered.
Phil Bourque was recently interviewed by Bob Grove on the subject and estimated that he had seven concussions during his playing career!