• Mon. Nov 25th, 2024

Penguins Get Hagelin from Ducks for Perron, Clendening

avatar

ByRick Buker

Jan 16, 2016

The Pittsburgh Penguins have a new left wing. Burning the midnight oil in the wake of last night’s 5-4 overtime loss to Tampa Bay, general manager Jim Rutherford swapped underachieving forward David Perron and spare defenseman Adam Clendening to Anaheim for left wing Carl Hagelin.

Impetus for the deal? Struggling offenses and disappointing overall performance. The Pens presently are ranked 26th in the NHL in goals; the Ducks a league-worst 30th. With virtually identical records, each team is lagging in the chase for a playoff berth.

Seeking to remedy his team’s paltry production from the port side (14 goals), Rutherford hopes to catch lightning in a bottle with the 27-year-old Hagelin. The speedy Swede should see lots of ice time beside superstar centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin.

Following consecutive 17-goal seasons with the Rangers, Hagelin faltered out west, tallying just four goals in 43 games with the Ducks. Regarded as a capable if somewhat streaky scorer, the 5’11” 186-pounder also is an excellent penalty killer. A key factor, no doubt, given the recent injury to Nick Bonino.

On the heels of a red-hot start after his arrival last January (nine goals in his first 16 games), Perron struggled to justify the trade that saw Rutherford surrender a No. 1 pick to Edmonton. Prone to extended dry spells, the Quebec native managed a meager seven goals over his last 70 regular-season games—far below his expected output. While the feisty winger found other ways to contribute (105 hits this season), he failed to click with either Crosby or Malkin on a consistent basis. Nor did he live up to his hefty $3.8 million cap hit.

Acquired over the past summer in the trade that sent Brandon Sutter to Vancouver, Clendening skated in nine games for the black and gold. Although he registered an assist and flashed occasional promise, the former AHL and collegiate all-star never was able to break into the Pens’ defensive rotation full-time. A shaky outing during a shootout loss to the Oilers on November 28 caused Clendening to slip behind prospect Derrick Pouliot and retread David Warsofsky on the depth chart.

One thing the trade won’t provide? Long-term cap relief. Hagelin inked a four-year, $16 million deal with the Ducks in August. Perron (UFA) and Clendening (RFA) are slated to be free agents this summer.

The deal marks the second swap between the Pens and Ducks in the past ten months. In one of the most unpopular trades in franchise history, JR sent young defenseman Simon Despres to Anaheim for veteran Ben Lovejoy on March 2.

Sheary Recalled

The Penguins recalled forward Conor Sheary from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton yesterday. The diminutive winger suited up last night against Tampa Bay and was caught flatfooted in the neutral zone on the Lightning’s first goal. He finished the game minus-1 (with one shot) in 3:37 of ice time.

For the season, Sheary’s collected two points (1+1) and is a minus-6 in 11 games with the Penguins. The Massachusetts native currently leads the Baby Pens in scoring with 33 points (7+26) in 28 games.

3 thoughts on “Penguins Get Hagelin from Ducks for Perron, Clendening”
  1. So we give up a overrated player for another?? And are stuck with more cap problems??
    Hey Rutherford you already have Kunitz and Kessel as streaky scorers, so why get another??

    Plain and simple….. I said it when they hired him.. Jim Rutherford wrecked the Hurricanes and the Pen’s are in a major free fall because of that idiot.
    So Rick how long or what will it take for the ownership too fire his A$$

    1. I hear ya, Pen’s 4ever.

      I sense Rutherford’s operating under enormous pressure to prop the team up to a) make the playoffs and b) keep up appearances for potential buyers. The fact that we have next-to-nothing down at Wilkes-Barre in terms of real help pretty much forces him to improve the team through trades.

      Other GMs aren’t dumb. They see JR coming and know he’s anxious to make a deal. So, as often as not, we overpay and/or inherit a problem from our trade partner (Hagelin’s contract). Which is how we’ve morphed into an all-too-reasonable facsimile of Rutherford’s old Hurricanes. (Not to be confused with the NEW Hurricanes, who are much improved under ex-Pen Ron Francis.)

      Bottom line? If the Penguins don’t make the playoffs (or even if they do), I think Rutherford will be encouraged to “retire” at the end of the season.

  2. Hi Rick,…. continuing from our last post.
    FOUR YEARS at $ 4 million for at best 17 goals a year. This is Crazy..
    We will live to regret this trade.As you pointed out, we just got rid of one bad contract and now we got another one to deal with.Why won’t people ever learn? They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
    Lets add Kessel at 6.8 million a year for another seven years for 30-35 goals a year maybe. Letang at 7 million plus for 6-7 more years.( with all his size and health issues). Patrick H. at 4.1 million for 4 more years. Kunitz at 3.8 million for two years.Trevor Daley at 4.2 million for 2 years.Then the core of a 28 year old Crosby at 8.7 million for 9 more years,Geno at 9.5 million for 7 more years and finally a thirty year old MAF at 5.7 million for 4 years. Does not look good.
    My point being that three years ago,we had the same core with 3 better d-man on the team,better prospects then, and we still never came close to winning a cup ! What is really wrong with this team Rick ? Something is going to have to change eventually.
    Even if we do make the playoffs, we are still going to lose in the first round because we are not physical enough to handle a seven game series and we do not have a deep enough talent pool to replace a Letang or a Daley if they get injured.
    To use a Basketball analogy.If a small fast team comes up against a big,fast team of equal talent…Bet on the big one ! That is one of the main problems of my Pens as I see it ! THEY CAN’T BEAT THE BIG GUYS, they are to small !
    Thanks again.

Comments are closed.