• Thu. Dec 26th, 2024

Penguins Update: Rating Rutherford’s Moves (2016-17)

avatar

ByRick Buker

Nov 30, 2020

Sometimes the best moves are the ones you don’t make. A concept Penguins GM Jim Rutherford fully grasped during the 2016-17 campaign.

In stark contrast to his first two seasons at the helm, when he orchestrated a massive overhaul of the black-and-gold roster, Rutherford executed a rather dramatic turnabout in philosophy following the Cup triumph in 2016. Belying his reputation as a wheeler-dealer, he embraced a patient, if-it-ain’t-broke-don’t-fix-it approach, to the greatest effect possible.

In an understated way, he was even more masterful. With the exception of departing free agents Beau Bennett, Ben Lovejoy and Jeff Zatkoff the defending Cup champs remained virtually intact.

JR did his darndest to keep them that way. In terms of importing players, he focused on adding depth defenders such as Cameron Gaunce, feisty Steve Oleksky and Chad Ruhwedel, who proved to be a savvy signing. Brought back for an encore, Matt Cullen once again proved to be a vital cog.

Not listed in my table (for simplicity’s sake I’m only showing UFA signings and new additions from outside the organization) was RFA defenseman Justin Schultz, who JR signed for one year at a very favorable $1.4 million.

Schultz blossomed, notching career highs in goals (12), assists (39) and points (51) to go with a sparkling plus-27. All the while averaging a hefty 20:27 of ice time.

His rapid development took on added significance in February when bulwark Kris Letang suffered a herniated disc in his neck…hockey’s worst-kept secret.

Pressure mounted for JR to add a defenseman with high-end offensive skill before the trade deadline. One just happened to be available. St. Louis was dangling power-play wiz Kevin Shattenkirk, prized at the time. His cap hit was fairly steep…$4.25 million.

The only way the Pens could afford him was to move goalie Marc-Andre Fleury. Said to be disenchanted with his 1A role behind Matt Murray, “Flower” quietly waived his no-trade, no-movement clause prior to the deadline.

However, JR maintained all along that he liked having two quality goalies. Eschewing a sexier deal, he instead acquired veteran defenseman Ron Hainsey from Carolina for a second-round pick and a minor-league forward.

A sturdy 6’3” 205-pounder who could play either side with equal ability, the 35-year-old Connecticut native proved to be the perfect under-the-radar addition. Having never skated for a playoff team during his 14-year NHL career, he was plenty motivated.

The rest, as they say, is history. Murray suffered a hamstring injury prior to the Pens’ first playoff game. Thrust into the spotlight, Fleury was brilliant, back-stopping the Pens past Columbus and a talented, ultra-determined Washington squad. One featuring none other than Shattenkirk.

Hainsey was huge, too. Sans Letang, the Pens were forced to stand and defend for long stretches against a blistering Capitals attack. The character defender helped weather the storm.

Having survived a scare, the Pens became the first team to capture back-to-back Cups in 20 years.

A consummate job by Rutherford. Individual transactions aside, another A in my book.

TRADES

Date

Team

Acquired

Traded

Rating

Nov. 2, 2016

Ottawa

5th round pick in 2017

Mike Condon (g)

B-: Condon sparkled, albeit for Ottawa.

Feb. 23, 2017

Carolina

Ron Hainsey (ld)

Danny Kristo (rw), 2nd round pick 2017

A: Terrific acquisition, Pens wouldn’t have won Cup without him.

Mar. 1, 2017

Tampa Bay

Mark Streit (ld)

4th round pick in 2018

B-: Didn’t play as big a role as Hainsey, but solid down the stretch.

Mar. 1, 2017

Toronto

Frank Corrado (rd)

Eric Fehr (c), Steve Oleksy (rd), 4th round pick in 2017

D+: Steep price for mobile, right-hand shot who didn’t pan out.

FREE AGENT/WAIVERS

Date

Old Team

Free Agent

Contract

Rating

Jul. 1, 2016

Florida

Cameron Gaunce (ld)

1 year, $575 thousand

B: Played well in a dozen games.

Jul. 1, 2016

Baby Pens (AHL)

Steve Oleksy (rd)

1 year, $575 thousand

B: Oleksy provided bite prior to trade.

Jul. 1, 2016

Buffalo

Chad Ruhwedel (rd)

1 year, $575 thousand

B+: Quintessential No. 7 d-man.

Jul. 1, 2016

Pittsburgh

Tom Sestito (lw)

1 year, $575 thousand

C+: Heavyweight served as part-time enforcer.

Jul. 1, 2016

Pittsburgh

David Warsofsky (ld)

1 year, $575 thousand

C-: Undersized defender minus-3 in 7 games.

Jul. 7, 2016

Florida

Garrett Wilson (lw)

1 year, $575 thousand

C+: Provided leadership and grit for Baby Pens.

Aug. 17, 2016

Pittsburgh

Matt Cullen (c)

1 year, $1 million

A-: Back for an encore, “Team Dad” shone once again.

Aug. 19, 2016

Notre Dame   (H-East)

Thomas Di Pauli (c)

2 years, $742.5 thousand (AAV)

D: Didn’t come close to living up to hype.

Oct. 11, 2016

Montreal

Mike Condon (g)

Claimed on waivers

B-: 1.000 save percentage on 7 shots.

Mar. 14, 2017

Northeastern  (H-East)

Zach Aston-Reese (lw)

2 years, $925 thousand (AAV)

C+: Hobey Baker finalist became solid defensive forward.

OVERALL GRADE: A

2 thoughts on “Penguins Update: Rating Rutherford’s Moves (2016-17)”
  1. Rick

    Good assessment of the moves made and not made
    by GM JR.

    I’m with the Other Rick on Warsofsky – I never understood
    what the Pen’s saw in him.

  2. Hey Rick,

    It is hard to rate the Condon trade – we only gave up a 5th round pick, but we really didn’t use him.

    I liked the Hainsey and Streit deals. Both deals were quiet, under the radar deals.

    Corrado on the other hand – you are right that was a bad, D, deal. The only real positive out of the deal was clearing Fehr’s Cap hit.

    The signings; Since most of those signings didn’t play much it is hard to rate them. Part of me would want to just give them all a gentlemen’s C and move on. However, with Warsofsky, like Simon, I never got the attraction. I would give this one an F. If he was a non-factor the first time you tried him, don’t go back, don’t waste a roster spot on a known failure. Try someone new. That may not turn out either, but you already know Warsofsky has no upside.

    I won’t argue with you on the overall grade. I will, however, qualify it by saying that I give the A only because of the trades JR didn’t make (as you mention at the on set of this piece). I give him an A for not dealing for Shattenkirk. I only wish he would have shown the same restraint a year later and passed on Brassard.

Comments are closed.