Being a bit of a nerd, I’ve always had a fascination with numbers. And the myriad of today’s ever-evolving hockey statistics truly boggle my mind.
Heck, you can track everything from a player’s zone starts to how their teammates perform with or without them (WOWY). Corsi, Fenwick…the list is endless.
Lately, I’m enamored of a relatively new stat—points per sixty minutes. To me, it provides a truer indication of a player’s production than points per game because it takes into account how much he’s actually on the ice.
Take Bryan Rust. The speedy winger’s averaged a good-but-not-great 0.50 points per game. However, his points per sixty rate of 2.23 compares favorably with the team’s top performers.
Another, albeit extreme example? Pens heavyweight Tom Sestito. He’s averaged a paltry 0.18 points per game. His points per sixty minutes? A surprising 2.21.
On the flip side, star defenseman Kris Letang boasts an impressive average of 0.83 points per game. Only slightly off the pace set by high-scoring forward Phil Kessel. Yet his points per sixty minute mark of 1.95, while decent, lags a full point behind “Phil the Thrill’s.”
The reason? “Tanger” logs a ton of minutes when healthy.
Of course, there are many factors to consider when evaluating a player’s productivity. Their role, for one. Are they used in offensive situations, such as the power play? Or are they strictly a five-on-five guy or defensive specialist. Are they are a forward or a defenseman?
Without further ado, the following table displays the Penguins’ points per sixty minutes (P/60), as well as points per game (P/GP). For good measure, I’ve included their Corsi for 60, too.
I found the results intriguing, if not entirely unexpected.
| Player | Pos | GP | TOI | PTS | P/GP | P/60 | Corsi for 60 |
| Archibald | RW | 3 | 28 | 2 | 0.67 | 4.34 | 54.1 |
| Malkin | C | 62 | 1154 | 72 | 1.16 | 3.74 | 51.9 |
| Crosby | C | 65 | 1292 | 80 | 1.23 | 3.71 | 53.8 |
| Sheary | RW | 51 | 800 | 47 | 0.92 | 3.53 | 53.6 |
| Kessel | RW | 71 | 1277 | 63 | 0.89 | 2.96 | 48.1 |
| Guentzel | LW | 34 | 548 | 25 | 0.74 | 2.74 | 52.2 |
| Hornqvist | RW | 60 | 955 | 39 | 0.65 | 2.45 | 55.1 |
| Rust | RW | 50 | 671 | 25 | 0.50 | 2.23 | 52.7 |
| Sestito | LW | 11 | 54 | 2 | 0.18 | 2.21 | 35.6 |
| Schultz | D | 68 | 1355 | 47 | 0.69 | 2.08 | 51.9 |
| Streit | D | 9 | 153 | 5 | 0.56 | 1.96 | 52.7 |
| Letang | D | 41 | 1046 | 34 | 0.83 | 1.95 | 52.9 |
| Wilson | LW | 68 | 727 | 23 | 0.34 | 1.90 | 51.5 |
| Cullen | C | 62 | 847 | 25 | 0.40 | 1.77 | 49.2 |
| Kunitz | LW | 65 | 995 | 28 | 0.43 | 1.69 | 49.9 |
| Gaunce | D | 7 | 76 | 2 | 0.29 | 1.58 | 46.8 |
| Bonino | C | 70 | 1148 | 30 | 0.43 | 1.57 | 46.8 |
| Kuhnhackl | RW | 46 | 465 | 12 | 0.26 | 1.55 | 45.4 |
| Hagelin | LW | 61 | 945 | 22 | 0.36 | 1.40 | 53.1 |
| Rowney | C | 16 | 154 | 3 | 0.19 | 1.17 | 51.3 |
| Fehr | C | 52 | 568 | 11 | 0.21 | 1.16 | 42.4 |
| Daley | D | 54 | 1097 | 19 | 0.35 | 1.04 | 46.7 |
| Ruhwedel | D | 26 | 435 | 7 | 0.27 | 0.96 | 50.3 |
| Cole | D | 71 | 1396 | 22 | 0.31 | 0.95 | 50.7 |
| Dumoulin | D | 60 | 1222 | 13 | 0.22 | 0.64 | 52.2 |
| Maatta | D | 54 | 973 | 7 | 0.13 | 0.43 | 49.0 |
| Oleksy | D | 11 | 151 | 1 | 0.10 | 0.40 | 51.6 |
| Hainsey | D | 10 | 207 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.29 | 51.5 |
| Pouliot | D | 10 | 144 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 46.9 |
| Sundqvist | C | 4 | 34 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 44.3 |
| Warsofsky | D | 6 | 91 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 50.9 |
Unless a club happens to be in the throes of a tear-it-down-to-the-floorboards rebuild, as a…
Inspired by an article on Pensburgh by Jim Rixner titled, “Mario Lemieux killing penalties,” I…
Back when the Penguins won the Stanley Cup in 2009 and went to consecutive Finals,…
It’s been a couple of days since the bombshell Ville Koivunen extension ($32 million over…
As the refrain from the old children’s marching song goes, “With a knick-knack paddywhack, give…
That was pretty much my reaction when PP colleagues Other Rick and Caleb DiNatale informed…